Showing posts with label 2008 Presidential Race. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2008 Presidential Race. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Don't worry Hillary, we love getting run over by busses

I have seen post after post and comment after comment on blog after blog talking about the race baiting Hillary and Bill Clinton have engaged in. I have seen people state how angry and disappointed they are with the Clintons. And in the next breath I have seen these same people state that if Hillary Clinton is the Democratic Nominee come this November, they will vote for her.

I wonder what the conversation between Bill and Hillary Clinton was like as they decided to use race baiting as their political strategy. I imagine it went something like this;

Bill - You know Hill, we can do a little race baiting since your campaign is sputtering a bit.

Hillary - But Bill, African Americans are our most loyal supporters. If we race bait we may lose their support in the general election.

Bill - Are you kidding me? (Hearty Laugh) If Martin Luther King, Jr. was the Republican Nominee African Americans still wouldn't vote for him. (Belly laugh) African Americans are afraid of Republicans!


Hillary - So you don't think there would be a political price to pay if we use race baiting as my political strategy?


Bill - (on the floor laughing) Hill, sweetheart, African Americans don't have any pride, haven't you seen the Flava of Love on VH1. We can say anything we want about them and they will still love us. Black people are more loyal than puppies.
Oh sure a few of them might say how hurt they are but when the chips are down they will not vote for a Republican. In fact we could show up at a campaign rally in Blackface and they'd still vote for us, ahem, I mean you. (Crying from laughing so hard)

Hillary - Okay then Bill, let's do it! Race baiting it is! White House here we come!


I'm not trying to convince anyone to vote for John McCain or Barack Obama. I am just wondering how we, African Americans, will ever have any political power if we allow ourselves to be thrown under the bus time and time again. We have seen many a Democrat show us that they have little respect for our votes. And why would they, we give our votes to them with out expecting anything in return.

If Hillary Clinton is the Nominee, most African Americans will vote for her. Our political fate will be assured. We will be assured that the next time it's politically expedient, Hillary Clinton will throw us under the bus, again.


What do you think?


If Hillary Clinton is the Democratic Nominee should African Americans support someone else?


Sunday, March 9, 2008

A blog reborn

A friend told me that she has heard more from me in the last week than she has in the last six months. Of course she was exaggerating but I got the point. It feels like I'm married to my blog. I seem to spend more time with it then any friend. But as all married people need time away from their spouses every now and then and I needed time away from my blog.

The first couple of days I didn't even miss blogging. I felt free having so much time in the evenings. I went out to dinner, spent some time with a friend, read, watched season 2 of The L Word (yes I know, I'm seriously behind) and yesterday I went for an amazing walk!

I'm getting the urge to spend some time again with my blog. A lot has gone on in the week that I've been away, politics, people in blackface, models suffering sad endings, models missing and found and Marion Jones reporting to Federal Prison. So I have a lot of things on my mind and thoughts to share.

It's time to get back to blogging, I will see you all bright and early on Monday morning!

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Remember Ralph Nader and the "N" Word?

This past weekend Ralph Nader announced the he will run (again) for President this year. I read quite a few posts about his return yesterday but I didn't see any about Mr. Nader's unfortunate use of the "N" word back in 2005.

Here is what he said;

From Blogcritics.com - Speaking Wednesday night at a Washington fund-raiser to retire the debt from his 2004 presidential campaign, Nader complained that Democratic Party powerbrokers had kept him off the ballot in such Southern states as Georgia and Virginia - which reminded him of the oppressive Jim Crow laws that denied African-Americans equal rights.

"I felt like a [n-word]," said Nader. (paragraph attribution: Blogcritics/ June 17, 2005)

How is it that a so-called politician, Nader, can use the "N" word and then think he can run for President? I have no interest in anything Ralph Nader has to say and I find it offensive that he has the audacity to run for President after his "N" word incident.


Does it bother you that Ralph Nader used the "N" word?

Are you willing to take him seriously knowing of his past use of the "N" word?



Saturday, February 23, 2008

What experience?

I have been wondering for quite some time what Senator Hillary Clinton means when she says she has more experience than Senator Barack Obama. She says this over and over again.

But I think it's time for a reality check.

Hillary Clinton was elected to the U.S. Senate in the year 2000. That means she has been a U.S. Senator for 7 years. Prior to that Hillary Clinton never held public office. She had been a practicing lawyer and on the board of several corporations. Her only other experience was being First Lady of the United States.

Barack Obama served in the Illinois Senate from 1997 to 2004. He was then elected to the U.S. Senate in 2004. That's just about 10 years of legislative experience.

So can anyone explain to me how it is that Hillary Clinton claims to have more experience than Barack Obama? Am I missing something?



Do you think Hillary Clinton has more experience than Barack Obama?


Why doesn't the media challenge her assertion that she has more experience?


Thursday, February 21, 2008

Question

Do you think Barack Obama, if elected President of The United States Of America, will or should apologize on behalf of the U.S. government for Slavery, Jim Crow Laws, stolen land and the many other atrocities committed against African Americans?


Japanese Americans who were interned during World War two received an apology and monetary compensation from the U.S. government. The details are below.

In 1988, U.S. President (and former California governor) Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, which had been pushed through Congress by Representative Norman Mineta and Senator Alan K. Simpson — the two had met while Mineta was interned at a camp in Wyoming — which provided redress of $20,000 for each surviving detainee, totaling $1.2 billion dollars. The question of to whom reparations should be given, how much, and even whether monetary reparations were appropriate were subjects of sometimes contentious debate.

World War Two internment camp

On September 27, 1992, the Civil Liberties Act Amendments of 1992, appropriating an additional $400 million in order to ensure that all remaining internees received their $20,000 redress payments, was signed into law by President George H. W. Bush, who also issued another formal apology from the U.S. government.


Would you hope for or expect an apology from Barack Obama?

Do you think the United States owes African Americans an apology?



Japanese Internment Information courtesy Wikipedia

Friday, February 15, 2008

Are Hillary and Barack Naïve or lying about Iraq?

Major U.S. military bases in Iraq (map courtesy FCNL)


I am at a loss to understand how most Americans are ignoring the fact that the U.S. is not leaving Iraq anytime soon. At this very moment the United States military is building military bases in Iraq. Why would the U.S. build bases if there was an expected pullout of troops in the near future?

The answer is that the U.S. has no intention what-so-ever of pulling troops out of Iraq. Look around the world for further evidence that the U.S. has no plans to leave Iraq. There are U.S. military bases in every theater that it has operated in the last century except Viet Nam. There are bases in Japan, Europe, South Korea and Cuba.

So why are the media and the Democratic Presidential candidates acting as though there is some actual chance that the U.S. will bring the troops home from Iraq?

Are Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton just uninformed or are they lying when they both say they will bring the troops home? I tend to think they are both lying. After all they both serve in the U.S. Senate so they are privy to all the goings on in Iraq. Which means the Senators know that the U.S. is not only occupying over 100 bases in Iraq but at least 14 of them are described by the Pentagon as "enduring bases".

It seems that the only Presidential candidate that is currently speaking the truth about America's future involvement in Iraq is Sen. John McCain. Say what you want about him but he is unabashedly giving the American people the "straight dope" on Iraq.

Another question is; why hasn't America's corporate media asked Obama or Clinton more about their supposed plans to bring troops home? Could it be that big business has a stake in America staying in Iraq?

Can you say oil.

The Iraq situation is problematic in terms of how the Democratic candidates are addressing it. There needs to be more real questioning of them by someone. Otherwise , if either is elected, they may just do what the Democratic Congress has done since taking the majority; which is make excuses as to why the troops are not home yet.


What do you think?

Are Clinton and Obama lying?

Do you really believe the troops are coming home any time soon?

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

There is a new frontrunner in town!

Barack Obama easily won the Potomac Primaries yesterday and is now the undisputed frontrunner in the Democratic race for the Nomination. Hillary Clinton is now putting all of her effort and hopes into the upcoming Texas and Ohio Primaries.

Do you think Hillary Clinton can come back or is it over for team Billary?

Monday, February 11, 2008

Why would I consider voting for John McCain...here's why

Recently I stated in a post that I was considering voting for John McCain. I have never voted for a Republican before, in fact I've never even considered it. But as I become more politically aware I am forced to consider alternatives to the Democrats.

I am looking at alternatives because the Democrats have not been responsive to my political needs and wants. In my opinion the Democrats are living on a reputation they earned in the 1960's. That was a time of great political up evil. It was a time of a controversial war and one of, if not the greatest civil rights movement in history.

It was a time when the Democrats pushed through civil rights legislation and were responsive to the calls of African Americans for equality.

The Democrats during that time were not perfect but they were indeed listening.

In the 1970's the Democrats began to listen less and less. They began to ignore the plight of many African Americans, especially those in so-called inner cities such as Chicago's South Side and The South Bronx in New York City.

The South Bronx in 1975, where were the Democrats?

They also ignored the impact that welfare was having on the aforementioned parts of African America. Although many in and out of those Black communities began to sound the alarm, the Democrats did not react.

As the 1980's came around those inner city areas were really in for it with the Reagan Presidency. It was a time when all sorts of evils overtook many Black communities. During that time the Democrats continued to pay lip service to the needs of their African American constituents. And the efforts they did make were misguided and led to even more misery.

For instance the so-called war on drugs in the United States, although it’s modern incarnation was the brain-child of Richard Nixon, it was the Democrats that watched as millions of their constituents became collateral damage in that so-called war. As with the misguided policies of public assistance or welfare programs the Democrats sat by again as Black neighborhoods were first used as a money making opportunity by the Reagan administration to fund a covert operation in Nicaragua, then barely held anyone accountable.

It's amazing that government officials admitted to helping foreign nationals import and sell cocaine in Black neighborhoods in Los Angeles and nothing was done about it.

The war on drugs continues except now the Democrats in all their wisdom want to release thousands of people who had been jailed for drug crimes. They pushed for an end to mandatory drug sentencing which has most directly impacted African Americans.

Although fair drug sentenceing is a good thing, it will not be a good thing to release at once thousands or even hundreds of thousands of drug offenders back into Black communities all over the country.

Has Nancy Pelosi done anything for you?

Even now as the Democrats hold the majority in Congress they have made no effort to correct any problems that afflict so many African Americans. Schools in Black communities are in disarray, welfare reforms instituted by Bill Clinton have caused many to be lost for another generation and crime spurred on by drug infestation in Black communities continues to take the lives of thousands of innocent African Americans.

Where has the Democratic Party been for the last 40 years?

I know that many people say as bad as the Democrats have been, the Republicans have been even worse. And I agree that they have. But have we, African Americans, held them accountable? Or have we simply pinned all of our political hopes on the Democrats?

I would say we have done the latter.

So do we continue to support the Democrats? Do we give them our political allegiance even though they have not done anything for us in 40 years?

Maybe it's time for us to hedge our political bets by giving a portion, a sizable portion, of our votes to the Republican candidate. If we don't and a Republican is elected for 4 or 8 years, what can we look forward to; years of being ignored by the Republican Party is what.

So I am considering giving my vote to a Republican candidate in hopes that if a large enough percentage of African Americans do the same we can hold some sway over a Republican President and just as importantly use those votes to make the Democrats work to get us back in the fold.

And those are my reasons for considering voting for the Republican Presidential Nominee.

Oh, one more thing; I had a sip of Obama kool-Aid Saturday night after he swept that day's political races in Nebraska, Washington State, Louisiana and the Virgin Islands. And it was very tasty, so if Obama ends up being the Democratic Nominee I might have another sip of the Obama Kool-Aid. That would mean I may have to delay my political strategy until after the 2008 race.


What do you think?

Do you think it's wise to put our collective political eggs in one basket?


Do you think the Democrats respect your vote?

Do you understand my reasoning?


Sunday, February 10, 2008

Hillary Clinton shows her true colors (again)

Hillary Clinton supporter 50 cent with Paris Hilton

Okay let me get this straight, the rapper known as 50 cent (Curtis Jackson) endorses Hillary Clinton and that's okay with her. But when a MSNBC news anchor says that the Clinton campaign has"pimped" Chelsea Clinton by having her make phone calls to voters, that's not okay?

A few days ago on MSNBC's Tucker Carlson Show, guest host David Shuster made a comment about the Clintons using their daughter to campaign.

Here is the exchange;

DAVID SHUSTER: Bill, there's just something a little bit unseemly to me that Chelsea's out there calling up celebrities, saying support my mom, and she's apparently also calling these super delegates.


BILL PRESS: Hey, she's working for her mom. What's unseemly about that? During the last campaign, the Bush twins were out working for their dad. I think it's great, I think she's grown up in a political family, she's got politics in her blood, she loves her mom, she thinks she'd make a great president --


SHUSTER: But doesn't it seem like Chelsea's sort of being pimped out in some weird sort of way?

After this aired the Clinton campaign complained about the use of the term "pimped out". In the days following the incident David Shuster apologized. Then MSNBC suspended him.

Once again Hillary Clinton shows her hypocritical and duplicitous nature.

First it was using her feminist friends such as Gloria Steinem to solicit women voters and then "hooking up" with BET founder Bob Johnson.

Hillary doesn't seem to have much concern for the daughters of African Americans. If she did she would have said no thanks to the endorsements of rapper 50 cent and BET founder Bob Johnson. Both of whom have made a fortune degrading Black women with all sorts of terms relating to "pimping".

I suppose she figures say whatever vile things you want about Black women and that's okay, but how dare anyone use these derogatory terms in reference to a White woman, namely her daughter.



Do you think Hillary Clinton is being a hypocrite?

Does this change your opinion of Hillary Clinton?


Saturday, February 9, 2008

Breaking News: Obama rises, Clinton falls

6:14 PM PST - CBS and ABC news are both reporting that Sen. Barack Obama has won the Washington State Caucus (78 delegates) and the Nebraska Caucus (24 delegates). They also report that he is leading, according to exit poles, in Louisiana (50 delegates). Results for the Virgin Islands Primary have not been reported yet, where there are 3 delegates at stake.

On tomorrow voters in Maine go to the polls for their state caucus; there will be 24 delegates at stake for the Democrats.

Democratic delegates count as of yesterday, February 8th;

Clinton - 1075
Obama - 991

Also reports indicate that Mike Huckabee has won the Republican Primary in Kansas today.

Friday, February 8, 2008

I'm voting for Barack on the issues I tell you!

I have a question that has been brewing for quite some time. I have been hoping that a columnist or blogger would answer this question for me. But thus far no one has. My question is; why are so many African Americans not willing to say they are voting or going to vote for Barack Obama because he's Black?

Recently in the Nevada Primary Mitt Romney a Mormon (who as you know is no longer in the race) won 90% plus of the Mormon vote in that state. I have seen and read time and time again White women saying they are voting for Hillary Clinton because she's a woman.

None of these groups, Mormons or White women seems to have any problem stating for the record that they are voting for a particular candidate because they resemble them in some way.

So why are so many African Americans saying to anyone who will listen that they are voting for Barack Obama because of his message or on the issues but not because he's Black? Are we, African Americans, just so much more politically mature than White women and Mormons?

And do you think that Irish-Catholic Americans didn't vote for JFK because he was Irish-Catholic?

Is this like the case of the only two Black people at a party avoiding speaking to each other for fear that everyone else in the room will think that the two are speaking to each other because, well because they are both Black?

Why is it a bad thing to so many African Americans to vote for Sen. Obama because he's Black like them?

I am not, for the record, playing Devil's advocate. I really don't get it.

Also as many of you know I am still undecided but leaning toward Sen. John McCain. Just in case anyone thinks I'm trying to convince people to vote for Obama.

So I ask you;

why are so many African Americans so reluctant to say publicly that they support Barack Obama because he's Black?

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Breaking News!

Mitt Romney is out of the race for the Republican Presidential Nomination. Do you think he may have struck a deal with McCain? Or was he just tired of spending his kid’s inheritance?

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Why isn't the media talking about the Bush-Clinton Dynasty?

I have been wondering why the so-called mainstream media has not been talking about the Bush-Clinton Dynasty. Those two families have headed the United States government since 1989. That's right since 1989, seems hard to believe but it's true.

So why wouldn’t the media talk about something so obvious?

Could it be that the Bush-Clinton Dynasty has been very, very good to the giant media conglomerates? Bill Clinton after all relaxed media ownership rules with the Telecommunications Act of 1996. And the current President Bush has continued down that road with his appointed FCC.


Just this past December Bush controlled Federal Communications Commission (FCC) once again relaxed media ownership rules. The FCC voted in December to allow media cross-ownership; which means that a media company may now own a TV station and newspaper in the same market. The rule banning such ownership had been in effect since 1975.

It is not in the Medias best interest to remind voters that another Clinton in the White House would mean an unprecedented amount of time that just two families would control the Executive branch of our government.

The question is; what is in our best interest?


What do you think?

Is the media participating in a conspiracy of silence on this?

Do you think the media is quietly trying to influence the race?

Delegates Count After Super Tuesday

Apparently in the United States of America no one knows how to count delegates since most of the major news organizations have different delegates counts. I am listing the delegates count from Associated Press as of 12:47am eastern time.


Democrats need 2025
Clinton 615

Obama 515

(Missouri was too close to call as of last night)


Republicans need 1191
McCain 497

Romney 200


Huckabee 141

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

Super Tuesday Map



Monday, February 4, 2008

Pre-Super Tuesday Delegates Count

Super Tuesday (2008), Super Duper Tuesday, Giga Tuesday, Tsunami Tuesday, and The Tuesday of Destiny are names for 5 February 2008, the day on which the largest-ever simultaneous number of state U.S. presidential primary elections will be held. Twenty-four states and American Samoa are scheduled to hold either caucuses or primary elections for one or both parties on this date.

The large number of states holding elections on February 5 could shorten the period between the first caucus in Iowa, on January 3, 2008, and the de facto selection of a party's nominee to just a few weeks. By comparison, only about 1% of nominating convention delegates had been selected by early February in the 2000 election cycle, whereas Super Tuesday 2008 shall see 52% of the Democratic and 41% of the Republican delegates awarded. - Wikipedia

Clinton 232 Delegates

Obama 158 Delegates

McCain 97 Delegates

Romney 74 Delegates

And Huckabee 29, Paul 6


Delegates needed for the nomination; Democrats need 2025, Republicans need 1191

Delegates count courtesy of CNN

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

A message for Bubba

Well Bill Clinton is at it again, he's playing the race card. This time after Senator Barack Obama's win in the South Carolina Primary he spouted the following;

"Jesse Jackson won South Carolina in '84 and '88. Jackson ran a good campaign. And Obama ran a good campaign here." - Bill Clinton

It's so incredibly obvious the Bill Clinton is so desperate to be President, oh pardon me, First Gentleman that he is employing the good 'ol Southern Strategy.

So I thought I would dedicate a song to Bill Clinton and oh yeah Hillary too. Even though Hillary seems less and less like the candidate every day.

So Bill this is for you...Pay close attention to the lyrics.

Sly & The Family Stone - Everyday People


And in case Bill still doesn't get it, here is a great post from Liz of Los Angelista's Guide To The Pursuit Of Happiness. I think she sums up what most people are thinking right now.

Here is an excerpt;

I don't know why the kids seemed so confused by my response. I mean, my seven year-old had the nerve to say, "Mom, why are you bringing up Jesse Jackson when I'm asking you about snow-capped mountains? It seems sort of like you're trying to inject race into a discussion about snow at higher elevations."

Read the rest here: Rain and Racism



Do you think that Bill Clinton is behaving more like a candidate than a spouse?
Will Bill be c0-President if Hillary wins the White House?


Tuesday, January 29, 2008

On being a cynic...

"BEING CYNICAL IS TOO HARSH ON THE HEART!! It makes life unbearable and robs you of hope and joy. So expect and hope for the best. What do you have to loose by doing so?" - Attorneymom

Those are the words of Attorney Mom on her blog Character Corner. Those words have been with me all afternoon.

And her words are with me as I think about the race for the Presidency tonight.

I am a cynical person. And I have been viewing the candidates through my cynical eyes as they make their way through the Primary season.

I have let my cynicism about America make me believe that a Black man cannot win the most Powerful office on the planet.

My cynicism leads me to think that America is far too racist to consider the content of Barack Obama's character rather than his skin color.

I have as I'm sure you have, if you are a person of color, experienced racism throughout my life. There have been no huge incidents but what I term micro-racism. Those are small incidents that we confront as we go through our daily lives. I am aware that more heinous examples of racism occur all the time.

I have to ask myself though; have I let the media in all of it's exploitative glory color my vision of America? Have I miss judged the American people?

I'm not quite ready to answer either of those questions in the affirmative. But I do think that America might be further along than I thought.

I'm not sure that Barack Obama can win the Presidency. Partly because I'm not sure if his message will resonate with the majority of Americans. But I wonder that about all of the candidates.

What I don't wonder about the rest of the candidates is can they overcome their race. I still wonder that about Mr Obama.

It's a long road to the Democratic Nomination, an even longer road to the White House and that road, I suspect,will be longer for Barack Obama than for any of the other candidates.

But Attorney Mom has convinced me, with her words, to put my cynicism aside. I will make an effort not to judge America through cynical eyes. I will assume that those who vote for Senator Obama are voting for him because they believe he has the best vision for America.

I will also assume that those who choose not to vote for the Senator choose not to because they feel he is not the most qualified for the job.

And I will try to not assume that all of the candidates are a bunch of crazy megalomaniacs. (That's going to be a hard one)

Super Tuesday is next week and that will be a great opportunity for me to put my new attitude in to practice.

What is the opposite of cynicism; would it be Naïveté? I'm not sure but I will watch and participate in the political process with an open mind.

I may relapse, but I'm going to try!

(Now if only Bill Clinton will just keep his mouth shut.)




Are you a cynic too?



Read Attorney Mom's entire post here: Expect The Best


Monday, January 28, 2008

The American Monarchy (Past, Present and Future)

King George I

King William

King George II

(Future Queen) Hillary

(Future King) Jeb

(Future King) George III


(Future Queen) Chelsea





Do you think two families ruling America is okay?


Sunday, January 27, 2008

Taken for granted...

Billary


Senator Barack Obama won the South Carolina Primary yesterday. He garnered a very large percentage of the Black vote. I think the Clintons, Bill and Hillary planned for this to happen. Here is why and how.

After the New Hampshire Primary, in which Hillary won, the Clintons began to make statements that were interpreted or misinterpreted as being racially offensive. Soon after that Hillary Clinton aligned herself with Black Entertainment Television founder Bob Johnson. That alignment angered many people in the Black community.

So why would an astute politician like Bill Clinton not see that all of these events were likely to anger and alienate many Black voters? Well maybe he did see it. Maybe it was a planned strategy in which race would become an issue.

Here is my contention; Bill Clinton knows that no matter what at least 90% of Black voters in a national election will vote for the Democratic Nominee, no matter what. So if that is the case then there would really be almost no risk in alienating Black voters.

Why alienate Black voters?

Many people speculate that if certain White voters begin to think of Barack Obama as the "Black" candidate then they will not vote for him. If that is the case, obviously they are likely to vote for Hillary.

So Barack Obama's win in South Carolina may have anointed him in the minds of many as the "Black" candidate. If this perception holds true then Hillary Clinton is now the undisputed front runner as the campaign now heads toward Super Tuesday.

Black voters will not be the deciders on Super Tuesday as they were in South Carolina. In fact Black voters won't again be an important voting block until the national election.

If Hillary is the Nominee, most Black voters will vote for her. All of the race baiting that the Clintons had engaged in would be forgotten. After all who else would Black voters vote for; the Republican nominee?

Nope that's not going to happen.

So the overwhelming support of the Democratic party by African Americans may have cost Barack Obama any serious chance of becoming the Democratic nominee.

In my opinion African American voters have usurped their own political power by being so loyal to the Democratic party. And the Clintons know that, so now what?

So now African Americans are just along for the ride until the National election.



What do you think?
Have African Americans blown it by being so loyal to the Democrats?


About Me

My Photo
Mes Deux Cents
West Coast, United States
African American, Poet?, Vegetarian, Music lover, Agoraphobic, Social Phobic
View my complete profile