I have been wondering why the so-called mainstream media has not been talking about the Bush-Clinton Dynasty. Those two families have headed the United States government since 1989. That's right since 1989, seems hard to believe but it's true.So why wouldn’t the media talk about something so obvious?
Could it be that the Bush-Clinton Dynasty has been very, very good to the giant media conglomerates? Bill Clinton after all relaxed media ownership rules with the Telecommunications Act of 1996. And the current President Bush has continued down that road with his appointed FCC.
Just this past December Bush controlled Federal Communications Commission (FCC) once again relaxed media ownership rules. The FCC voted in December to allow media cross-ownership; which means that a media company may now own a TV station and newspaper in the same market. The rule banning such ownership had been in effect since 1975.
It is not in the Medias best interest to remind voters that another Clinton in the White House would mean an unprecedented amount of time that just two families would control the Executive branch of our government.
The question is; what is in our best interest?
What do you think?
Is the media participating in a conspiracy of silence on this?
Do you think the media is quietly trying to influence the race?
